|
Already a Paid Member? Use the Member Login form on the right side to access the tests OR go to the Test Center
This is what the Quant Practice Test Package has to offer you:
1. 10 GMAT Quant Tests , to give you the BEST test experience.
2. Carefully customized tests specially designed to work on your areas of weaknesses.
3. Tough Quantitative questions to get you prepared for the tougher GMAT.
4. Detailed solutions to the questions provided on request.
5. Question, answer review immediately after each tests, where you compare your answers to the right answer.
6. Assured minimum improvement on your current GMAT Quant score.
|
Convinced and Ready to Start Practice Tests?
|
Already a FREE member? Login fist and Upgrade
|
|
|
|
GMAT Quantitative Strategies for Test Takers
In the GMAT quantitative section, you are required to solve every problem and choose the best of the 5 choices available. The level of mathematics required to work out each problem does not go beyond the basics of Aritmetic, Goemetry, Algedra that are part of school mathematcs. In this article we will discuss gmat quant strategies and tips required to successfully negotiate this section.
Crucial Strategies for GMAT Data Sufficiency:
1. The first and the most basic thing: STOP wasting time trying to solve the given problem. These questions only demand you to check if necessary and sufficient information and data has been provided to solve the question.
To begin, consider statements (1) and (2) individually and verify whether each alone presents enough info to solve the problem. Make absolutely sure that you forget about the information supplied in statement (1) while trying to evaluate the information rendered in statement (2).
If either of the given statements or both have enough information to get a solution to the problem, select the option which is appropriate. If not, see if both statements combined can get you a solution to the problem stated.
2. Note: when you are checking whether satisfactory information has been provided to answer a question like, “What is the value of x?” the data given should be enough to find just ONE value for x.
In case of geometric figures, do not make unfounded suppositions just by looking at the figures. Understand that the figures may not be drawn to scale; mostly they are just unspecified and very generic figures. For example, if a figure which is reported as a equilateral traingle LOOKS like a right-angled traingle, do not conclude that it is a right-angled traingle just by the way they look. What is mentioned in the question is more important.
|
